[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4741d4c7-d6f7-ecdb-1eed-1293175f38d9@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 12:29:15 +0530
From: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
To: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
<linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux OMAP List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: omap: Support scratch registers
On Monday 06 November 2017 12:25 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> + linux omap list
>
> On Tuesday 31 October 2017 09:57 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> Register an nvmem device to expose the 3 scratch registers (total of 12
>> bytes) to both userspace and kernel space.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
>
> Curious on what you are using these registers for.
This is in response to this:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9684955/
>
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
>
>> ---
>> drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
>> index d56d937966dc..1d666ac9ef70 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
>> @@ -70,6 +70,10 @@
>> #define OMAP_RTC_COMP_MSB_REG 0x50
>> #define OMAP_RTC_OSC_REG 0x54
>>
>> +#define OMAP_RTC_SCRATCH0_REG 0x60
>> +#define OMAP_RTC_SCRATCH1_REG 0x64
>> +#define OMAP_RTC_SCRATCH2_REG 0x68
>> +
>> #define OMAP_RTC_KICK0_REG 0x6c
>> #define OMAP_RTC_KICK1_REG 0x70
>>
>> @@ -667,6 +671,45 @@ static struct pinctrl_desc rtc_pinctrl_desc = {
>> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> };
>>
>> +static int omap_rtc_scratch_read(void *priv, unsigned int offset, void *_val,
>> + size_t bytes)
>> +{
>> + struct omap_rtc *rtc = priv;
>> + u32 *val = _val;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < bytes / 4; i++)
>> + val[i] = rtc_readl(rtc,
>> + OMAP_RTC_SCRATCH0_REG + offset + (i * 4));
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int omap_rtc_scratch_write(void *priv, unsigned int offset, void *_val,
>> + size_t bytes)
>> +{
>> + struct omap_rtc *rtc = priv;
>> + u32 *val = _val;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + rtc->type->unlock(rtc);
>> + for (i = 0; i < bytes / 4; i++)
>> + rtc_writel(rtc,
>> + OMAP_RTC_SCRATCH0_REG + offset + (i * 4), val[i]);
>> + rtc->type->lock(rtc);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct nvmem_config omap_rtc_nvmem_config = {
>> + .name = "omap_rtc_scratch",
>> + .word_size = 4,
>> + .stride = 4,
>> + .size = OMAP_RTC_KICK0_REG - OMAP_RTC_SCRATCH0_REG,
>> + .reg_read = omap_rtc_scratch_read,
>> + .reg_write = omap_rtc_scratch_write,
>> +};
>> +
>> static int omap_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct omap_rtc *rtc;
>> @@ -804,6 +847,8 @@ static int omap_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>>
>> rtc->rtc->ops = &omap_rtc_ops;
>> + omap_rtc_nvmem_config.priv = rtc;
>> + rtc->rtc->nvmem_config = &omap_rtc_nvmem_config;
>>
>> /* handle periodic and alarm irqs */
>> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, rtc->irq_timer, rtc_irq, 0,
>> --
>> 2.15.0.rc2
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists