lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 5 Nov 2017 20:04:38 -0500
From:   harinath Nampally <harinath922@...il.com>
To:     Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, knaack.h@....de,
        lars@...afoo.de, Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alison Schofield <amsfield22@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] iio: accel: mma8452: Rename config structs for readability

Hi Martin,

> I think it'd be great to have the "power_mode" iio ABI interface
> for mma8452 too, and I just found an old patch pf mine for this.
>
> If you say you could test it and check for correct API usage and
> ABI provisioning in sysfs, I'd be happy to publish it for you to
> make any necessary corrections and submit it after testing.
>
> Do we have a deal?
Sure, sounds great!

Thanks,
Harinath

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de> wrote:
> On 2017-11-05 19:00, Harinath Nampally wrote:
>> Rename structs holding event configuration registers
>> to more appropriate names. This naming is consistent
>> with the event config register names given in the
>> mma845x and fxls8471 datasheets.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Harinath Nampally <harinath922@...il.com>
>
> Makes sense to me.
>
> Acked-by: Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de>
>
>
> Hey Harinath,
>
> I think it'd be great to have the "power_mode" iio ABI interface
> for mma8452 too, and I just found an old patch pf mine for this.
>
> If you say you could test it and check for correct API usage and
> ABI provisioning in sysfs, I'd be happy to publish it for you to
> make any necessary corrections and submit it after testing.
>
> Do we have a deal?
>
> thanks
>
>                              martin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists