Date:   Mon, 6 Nov 2017 11:00:18 +0100
From:   Ywe Cærlyn <email@...-ywecrlyn-m0a.net>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: A test of the philosophical impact of what I have been talking
 about

Den 11/4/2017 23:53, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
> Den 11/3/2017 07:46, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>> Den 10/29/2017 17:21, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>> Den 10/29/2017 17:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:28, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:01, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>> Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux 
>>>>>> distribution:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel.
>>>>>> An Available Source Operating System.
>>>>>> Philosophical Lead: Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in operation. 
>>>>>> Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short buffers, lowest 
>>>>>> latency, minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU, max cpu utilization.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct attitude.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we don´t have yet, 
>>>>>> but how does it sound?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peace,
>>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have made a good logo 
>>>>> aswell:http://xn--ywecrlyn-m0a.net/ExcellentUbuntu/ExcellentUbuntu.png
>>>>>
>>>> I really believe in this, and what makes this just perfect: Everyone 
>>>> is their own newsservice, getting their views on for instance, 
>>>> youtube. And gets the income from this. Which makes a finely 
>>>> granulated internet economy.
>>>>
>>>> A test channel: 
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
>>>>
>>>> Peace,
>>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>
>>> With Linus Torvalds as patchmeister as usual, ofcourse.
>>>
>> So considering this, and the finely granulated internet economics 
>> comes from this type of mindset, and with reintergration of it back, I 
>> would suggest changing the naming scheme of "open source", and "free 
>> software" to "Available Source". It is repeated a lot, and needs to 
>> have a corresponding name. (To not speak of avoiding uneccesary 
>> pointer variables in GNU code... ). This is also based on on my 
>> conclusion on philosophy research over 15 years, and that things need 
>> to be right. And even metaphysically. For Success. I also CC Richard 
>> Stallman on this, maybe GNU4.0 will make considerations for this. The 
>> hacker will now not only be free, but make money. ;)
>>
>> Peace.
>>
>>
>>
> Mister GNU Richard Stallman replied me two times on this, since he did 
> not mail LKML, I will restate them here, for the record.
> 
> |
> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]|
> |
> |It seems that you're making a new variant of GNU/Linux.  If you call
> |it "something Linux", you are talking about our work but giving us
> |none of the credit.  Please call it "something GNU/Linux" so as to
> |give us equal mention.
> |
> |See https://gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html and
> |https://gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html, plus the history in
> |https://gnu.org/gnu/the-gnu-project.html.
> |
> |--
> |Dr Richard Stallman
> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
> |
> And-
> 
> |
> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> |
> |"Available source" is too weak a criterion.  Free software and open
> |source stand for categories of software that are nearly coterminous.
> |However, available source is a much weaker criterion and would
> |include programs that don't come anywhere near free.
> |
> |Also, the point of the free software movement is that users deserve
> |freedom.  "Available source" doesn't even hint at this idea,
> |so it would not communicate what we want to say.
> |
> |
> |--
> |Dr Richard Stallman
> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
> |
> 
> Not even an acknowledgement on pointer variables from this 
> self-appointed spokesman for hackers. Or indeed the larger issue of 
> finegranulated internet economics. How shall an OS indeed succeed if it 
> chokes its own success?
> 
> To not speak of the paranoid insertions. Does he fear mountains shall 
> fall on him, for GNU? Indeed GNU seems to be his qualifier and god, he 
> slaves to.
> 
> Or is gnu, a god to slave to, free software your food, and Richard 
> Stallman its Jesusian son? Will it be up to others to make the decision?
> 
> How much is this in conflict with pure hacking, from C64 asm, to PC C, 
> and the original unix hacking?
> 
> Have a Mindful Zen moment on this.
> 

As for my own experience, check out my Biit channel where I am going to 
go through highlights, and do DSP retrofits, remasters etc.

For instance this track: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMfWsx3JBUg
Uses my own developed absolute minimal psychacoustically corrected phase 
plateau band EQ. Here I am even using these EQs in serial and parallel 
on the mix, and on the master, without phaseartifacts. A further 
developement of the IIR-FIR discussion, into a solution with similar 
sound of input and output.

Have you ever seen such a thing before? No?. Well I made that.

I also did a custom theme for the app used there. Which will be the 
principles I will use in "Excellent Ubuntu" aswell.

Peace.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists