[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda888GdPdH_qkeyA64hukyqxryc1uvHWEab92PR32Xt_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 14:22:22 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Grygorii Strashko
<grygorii.strashko@...com> wrote:
> On 11/03/2017 05:50 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> I guess I will consider queueing them already for v4.15 if
>> Torvalds churns out another -rc on sunday, I do not
>> doubt that you will finish it as we have discussed with banks and
>> all. If v4.14 is released on sunday let's queue this early for v4.16.
>
> Can you see my reply?
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/3/820
Yes so I was considering queueing patches 1-9 with your ACK so
Thierry can get his patch stack down and focus on the add-on
stuff at the end of the series.
Thierry, does it sound reasonable?
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists