[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5A006AEA.7050907@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 16:00:10 +0200
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
To: Chen Yu <chenyu56@...wei.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: wangbinghui@...ilicon.com, mathias.nyman@...el.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fanning4@...ilicon.com, lirui39@...ilicon.com,
yangdi10@...ilicon.com, groeck@...gle.com, john.stultz@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb:xhci fix panic in
xhci_free_virt_devices_depth_first
On 06.11.2017 14:36, Chen Yu wrote:
>
>
> On 2017/11/6 19:32, Greg KH wrote:
>>> A simple process is as below:
>>> xhci_plat_probe()
>>> |
>>> usb_add_hcd() xhci_plat_remove()
>>> | |
>>> find some device usb_remove_hcd()
>>> | |
>>> hub_port_connect() -> usb_alloc_dev() usb_disconnect()
>>> | |
>>> before hub_enable_device() xhci_stop()
>>> |
>>> xhci_mem_cleanup()
>>> |
>>> xhci_free_virt_devices_depth_first()
>>> |
>>> real_port is 0 access xhci->rh_bw[vdev->real_port-1]
>>>
>>> The problem came from https://bugs.96boards.org/show_bug.cgi?id=535
>>> Also look at crbug.com/700041
>>
>> Then the bug needs to be fixed, throwing a huge kernel trace message
>> into the kernel log is not "fixing" the problem at all, right?
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>>
>> .
>>
>
> You are right, the way that xhci_plat_remove() to be called needs to be fixed.
> But there is still possibility for this crash.
> What do you think if just add an "xhci_warn" instead of "WARN_ON"?
> + if (!vdev->real_port) {
> + xhci_warn(xhci, "Bad vdev->real_port\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
>
This patch solves the issue, just drop all the error messages.
vdev->real_port is not set until the the device enable/address
stage, and we know it won't have any children yet then, so no need to
worry about a child having tt pointers to this device.
The "goto out" to xhci_free_virt_device() you do is fine here.
xhci_plat_remove() is the .remove callback for the xhci platform driver.
It might get called before a device is properly enabled/addressed.
Not really a error. A unlikely but possible situation.
xhci_free_tt_info() already has a similar check
Thanks
-Mathias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists