lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 6 Nov 2017 10:47:09 -0800
From:   Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, leedom@...lsio.com,
        herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, Harsh@...lsio.com,
        jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Fix scatterlist offset handling

On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 16:43:09 +0200
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 07:05:17PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > Now, there are indeed plenty of drivers and subsystems which do
> > work on lists of explicitly single pages - anything doing some
> > variant of "addr = kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg)) + sg->offset;" is easy
> > to spot - but I don't think DMA API implementations are in a
> > position to make any kind of assumption; nearly all of them just
> > shut up and handle sg->length bytes from sg_phys(sg) without
> > questioning the caller, and I reckon that's exactly what they
> > should be doing.  
> 
> I agree with that, it is not explicitly forbidden to have an
> sg->offset > PAGE_SIZE and most IOMMU drivers handle this case.
> 
> So this is a problem I'd like to see resolved in the VT-d driver too.
> If nobody comes up with a correct fix soon I'll apply this one and
> rip out the large-page support from __domain_mapping() to make it
> work.
> 
Hi All,

Just to give an update on the offline debugging of this issue. With
Robin's patch applied, I was able to reproduce the failure with
similar configuration that Jain helped to set up.

I added trace prints just to see the map/unmap activities leading to
the DMAR fault. When fault occurs, the trace shows there is an unmap to
the offending iova pfn. So I think this is a separate problem than
Robin's patch is fixing. I think we should move forward to merge this
patch upstream and stable. The remaining problem is likely a race
condition between unmap and DMA activities.

Here a brief extracted log, ee3d7 is the iova pfn in question.
#1. map sg pfn ee3d7
          <idle>-0     [076] 74124.154254: bprint:               __domain_mapping: vpfn:ee3d7, pgoff=2126, np:1, da:ee3d784e, len:1464
, ppfn:1849c9c                                                                                                                        

#2. unmap ee3d7000
         <idle>-0     [054] 74124.154301: bprint:               intel_unmap: Device 0000:18:00.4 unmapping: pfn ee3d7-ee3d7          
         <idle>-0     [076] 74124.154301: bprint:               __domain_mapping: lvlpg:1, nrpg 0, vpfn:ec2ff, ppfn:183221a, sg_res:0
         <idle>-0     [059] 74124.154302: bprint:               __domain_mapping: lvlpg:1, nrpg 0, vpfn:ee719, ppfn:c3e4dd, sg_res:0 
         <idle>-0     [076] 74124.154302: bprint:               __domain_mapping: vpfn:f183b, pgoff=78, np:1, da:f183b04e, len:1464, 

#3. DMA to unmapped address ee3d7000, DMAR fault raised.
  +2.952861] dmar_fault: 6 callbacks suppressed                                                                                   
  +0.000002] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2                                                                              
  +0.005588] turning tracing off                                                                                                  
  +0.003592] DMAR: [DMA Write] Request device [18:00.4] fault addr ee3d7000 [fault reason 05] PTE Write access is not set         
                                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
         <idle>-0     [000] 74124.156906: bputs:
         0xffffffffb259916bs: turning tracing off     


Thanks,

Jacob

> Speaking of __domain_mapping(), this function is a big unmaintainable
> mess which should be split and rewritten. A clean and maintainable
> rewrite can alse re-add the large-page support.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 	Joerg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

[Jacob Pan]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ