lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 6 Nov 2017 18:59:56 +0000
From:   Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
        Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@...il.com>
CC:     linux-cifs <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>
Subject: RE: [Patch v5 08/21] CIFS: SMBD: Upper layer reconnects to SMB Direct
 session

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Wilcox
> Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 10:10 AM
> To: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>; Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@...il.com>
> Cc: linux-cifs <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>; Stephen Hemminger
> <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>; linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org; Kernel Mailing
> List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>
> Subject: RE: [Patch v5 08/21] CIFS: SMBD: Upper layer reconnects to SMB
> Direct session
> 
> Oh, I hadn't noticed that.  Then I amend my suggestion to be:
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_SMB_DIRECT
> #define cifs_rdma_enabled(server)	((server)->rdma)
> #else
> #define cifs_rdma_enabled(server)	0
> static inline void cifs_reconnect(struct TCP_Server_Info *server) { } #endif

I will address those and update patch.

> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Long Li
> > Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2017 2:20 PM
> > To: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>; Matthew Wilcox
> > <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>; Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@...il.com>
> > Cc: linux-cifs <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>; Stephen Hemminger
> > <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>; linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org; Kernel Mailing
> > List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>
> > Subject: RE: [Patch v5 08/21] CIFS: SMBD: Upper layer reconnects to
> > SMB Direct session
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: samba-technical
> > > [mailto:samba-technical-bounces@...ts.samba.org]
> > > On Behalf Of Long Li via samba-technical
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2017 10:37 AM
> > > To: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>; Pavel Shilovsky
> > > <piastryyy@...il.com>
> > > Cc: linux-cifs <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>; Stephen Hemminger
> > > <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>; linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org;
> > > samba-technical <samba-technical@...ts.samba.org>; Kernel Mailing
> > > List <linux- kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Steve French
> > > <sfrench@...ba.org>
> > > Subject: RE: [Patch v5 08/21] CIFS: SMBD: Upper layer reconnects to
> > > SMB Direct session
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Matthew Wilcox
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 12:45 PM
> > > > To: Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@...il.com>; Long Li
> > > > <longli@...rosoft.com>
> > > > Cc: Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>; linux-cifs <linux-
> > > > cifs@...r.kernel.org>; samba-technical
> > > > <samba-technical@...ts.samba.org>;
> > > > Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; linux-
> > > > rdma@...r.kernel.org; Tom Talpey <ttalpey@...rosoft.com>;
> Stephen
> > > > Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>; Long Li
> <longli@...rosoft.com>
> > > > Subject: RE: [Patch v5 08/21] CIFS: SMBD: Upper layer reconnects
> > > > to SMB Direct session
> > > >
> > > > From: Pavel Shilovsky [mailto:piastryyy@...il.com]
> > > > > 2017-10-18 16:09 GMT-07:00 Long Li
> <longli@...hange.microsoft.com>:
> > > > > > From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do a reconnect on SMB Direct when it is used as the connection.
> > > > > > Reconnect
> > > > > can
> > > > > > happen for many reasons and it's mostly the decision of SMB2
> > > > > > upper
> > > > layer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  fs/cifs/connect.c | 7 +++++++
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c index
> > > > > > 2c0b34a..8ca3c13 100644
> > > > > > --- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
> > > > > > +++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> > > > > > @@ -406,7 +406,14 @@ cifs_reconnect(struct TCP_Server_Info
> > > > > > *server)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >                 /* we should try only the port we connected to before */
> > > > > >                 mutex_lock(&server->srv_mutex);
> > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_SMB_DIRECT
> > > > > > +               if (server->rdma)
> > > > > > +                       rc = smbd_reconnect(server);
> > > > > > +               else
> > > > > > +                       rc = generic_ip_connect(server);
> > > > >
> > > > > Minor: here and in other similar places we can remove #else part
> > > > > below and put #endif before else block above.
> > > > >
> > > > > > +#else
> > > > > >                 rc = generic_ip_connect(server);
> > > > > > +#endif
> > > >
> > > > I'd suggest rather:
> > > >
> > > > #ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_SMB_DIRECT
> > > > #define cifs_rdma_enabled(server)	((server)->rdma)
> > > > #else
> > > > #define cifs_rdma_enabled(server)	0
> > > > #endif
> > > >
> > > > Then we don't need an ifdef in the users, just:
> > > >
> > > > 	if (cifs_rdma_enabled(server))
> > > > 		rc = smbd_reconnect(server);
> > > > 	else
> > > > 		rc = generic_ip_connect(server);
> >
> > It doesn't work well, because smbd_reconnect is defined when
> > CONFIG_CIFS_SMB_DIRECT is set. Now the compiler is complaining it
> > can't find this function. Maybe compiler is not smart enough :)
> >
> > I have sent v6 for all the other comments.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists