linux-kernel - Re: WTF? Re: [PATCH] License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Nov 2017 19:30:56 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
        xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WTF? Re: [PATCH] License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license
 identifier to files with no license

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 05:25:17PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > And from what I know, there is nothing that is "non-copyrightable".  
> > > 
> > > You'd be wrong on that. Lots of things are not copyrightable.  
> > 
> > Ok, fair enough, but code is not one of those :)
> 
> You'd still be wrong.

Ok, fine, I don't want to argue nuances, there's lots of exceptions to
the rule for stuff like this, let's just say that "most" code is
copyrightable and leave it at that :)

And that's not what this thread is about, no copyrights got changed at
all with this pull request.

thanks,

greg k-h