[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b970e5b-50e6-bcc1-e8d3-6e3aa8523f55@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 14:47:10 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>, Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>
Cc: mpe@...erman.id.au, mingo@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
corbet@....net, arnd@...db.de, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, paulus@...ba.org,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/51] powerpc, mm: Memory Protection Keys
On 11/07/2017 02:39 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
>
> As per the current semantics of sys_pkey_free(); the way I understand it,
> the calling thread is saying disassociate me from this key.
No. It is saying: "this *process* no longer has any uses of this key,
it can be reused".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists