[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1510009382.187198532@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 23:03:02 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 248/294] net: caif: fix misleading indentation
3.16.50-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
commit 8e0cc8c326d99e41468c96fea9785ab78883a281 upstream.
gcc points out code that is not indented the way it is
interpreted:
net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c: In function 'cfpkt_setlen':
net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c:289:4: error: statement is indented as if it were guarded by... [-Werror=misleading-indentation]
return cfpkt_getlen(pkt);
^~~~~~
net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c:286:3: note: ...this 'else' clause, but it is not
else
^~~~
It is clear from the context that not returning here would be
a bug, as we'd end up passing a negative length into a function
that takes a u16 length, so it is not missing curly braces
here, and I'm assuming that the indentation is the only part
that's wrong about it.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c
+++ b/net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ int cfpkt_setlen(struct cfpkt *pkt, u16
else
skb_trim(skb, len);
- return cfpkt_getlen(pkt);
+ return cfpkt_getlen(pkt);
}
/* Need to expand SKB */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists