[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171107020113.52ws4cqhonhk2zvw@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:01:13 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, lkp@...org
Subject: [d_alloc_parallel] WARNING: bad unlock balance detected!
Hi,
Here is a warning in v4.14-rc8 -- it's not necessarily a new bug.
[ 428.512005] e1000: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX
LKP: HOSTNAME vm-lkp-wsx03-openwrt-i386-8, MAC , kernel 4.14.0-rc8 158, serial console /dev/ttyS0
[ 429.798345] Kernel tests: Boot OK!
[ 430.761760]
[ 430.766166] =====================================
[ 430.775297] WARNING: bad unlock balance detected!
[ 430.784342] 4.14.0-rc8 #158 Not tainted
[ 430.792153] -------------------------------------
[ 430.801319] pidof/1024 is trying to release lock (rcu_preempt_state) at:
[ 430.813514] [<c10e4348>] rcu_read_unlock_special+0x5f8/0x620
[ 430.824041] but there are no more locks to release!
[ 430.833342]
[ 430.833342] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 430.845985] 2 locks held by pidof/1024:
[ 430.853826] #0: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key){....}, at: [<c1266efa>] lookup_slow+0x8a/0x310
[ 430.869344] #1: (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: [<c128094e>] d_alloc_parallel+0x7e/0xd10
[ 430.884215]
[ 430.884215] stack backtrace:
[ 430.893488] CPU: 0 PID: 1024 Comm: pidof Not tainted 4.14.0-rc8 #158
[ 430.905217] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
[ 430.920682] Call Trace:
[ 430.926481] dump_stack+0x16/0x1c
[ 430.933406] print_unlock_imbalance_bug+0xb9/0xd0
[ 430.942512] ? rcu_read_unlock_special+0x5f8/0x620
[ 430.951690] ? rcu_read_unlock_special+0x5f8/0x620
[ 430.960928] lock_release+0x1cc/0x490
[ 430.968446] ? rcu_gp_kthread_wake+0x34/0x50
[ 430.976960] ? rcu_read_unlock_special+0x5f8/0x620
[ 430.986108] rt_mutex_unlock+0x1e/0xb0
[ 430.993754] rcu_read_unlock_special+0x5f8/0x620
[ 431.003016] __rcu_read_unlock+0xa7/0xb0
[ 431.010665] d_alloc_parallel+0x345/0xd10
[ 431.018441] lookup_slow+0xe4/0x310
[ 431.025500] walk_component+0x146/0x590
[ 431.031915] path_lookupat+0xcc/0x3f0
[ 431.038634] ? 0xc1000000
[ 431.042398] ? 0xc1000000
[ 431.046246] filename_lookup+0xd8/0x290
[ 431.051246] ? strncpy_from_user+0x13f/0x260
[ 431.056818] user_path_at_empty+0x25/0x30
[ 431.062068] SyS_readlink+0x52/0x130
[ 431.066929] do_int80_syscall_32+0x95/0x290
[ 431.072306] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f
[ 431.077230] EIP: 0xb7f0e6a2
[ 431.081187] EFLAGS: 00000296 CPU: 0
[ 431.085910] EAX: ffffffda EBX: bf82714b ECX: 080964b8 EDX: 00000050
[ 431.095247] ESI: 00000050 EDI: bf82714b EBP: bf827124 ESP: bf827100
[ 431.107404] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b
[ 431.617153] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device eth0
[ 433.538079] e1000: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX
Thanks,
Fengguang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists