[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5586546-1e7e-0f0f-a8b3-680fadb38dcf@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 12:26:12 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: POWER: Unexpected fault when writing to brk-allocated memory
On 11/07/2017 12:15 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> First of all, using addr and MAP_FIXED to develop our heuristic can
>> never really give unchanged ABI. It's an in-band signal. brk() is a
>> good example that steadily keeps incrementing address, so depending
>> on malloc usage and address space randomization, you will get a brk()
>> that ends exactly at 128T, then the next one will be >
>> DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW, and it will switch you to 56 bit address space.
>
> No, it won't. You will hit stack first.
That's not actually true on POWER in some cases. See the process maps I
posted here:
<https://marc.info/?l=linuxppc-embedded&m=150988538106263&w=2>
Thanks,
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists