[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcU2+cbWDkt+6gd9+bHjxDpA-hA5KuQNVCn-AJr1SLANQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 14:49:48 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Marco Chiappero <marco@...ence.it>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
Mattia Dongili <malattia@...ux.it>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Sony-laptop: Adjustments for sony_nc_setup_rfkill()
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:20 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>> Do you find the following details useful for further clarification?
>>>
>>> text: -32
>>> data: 0
>>> bss: 0
...
>> So, the main question is "WHY" you are doing this change.
>>
>> I didn't find any convinced explanation (yet?).
>
> Do you find a reduction of 32 bytes for the object code not interesting
> enough just by achieving such a small effect because of the replacement
> of three function calls “rfkill_destroy” with goto statements?
Okay, it's something.
Update a commit message in your patch, use bloat-o-meter (and put its
output to the commit message) and resend, we might reconsider then.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists