lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFz5Z8dfLp1swfOaEomH21mvCFEy=4w6L0cWska=He45FQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Nov 2017 13:09:29 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Unbreak modules that rely on external PAGE_KERNEL availability

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> Despised-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

So I despise the patch for a different reason: I hate it when we
export data symbols like this.

But that's independent of the GPL-vs-not issue, and it's not like this
is the first time it happens.

Generally we should export _functionality_, not data.

The fact that we need to export access to some random global data that
we then use in an inline function or macro to me says that the code
was not designed right to begin with.

But yeah, I guess we can't fix that easily as-is, and people who just
randomly slap _GPL() on the export should stop doing that. It's *not*
a default thing, quite the reverse. It should be something that is so
core - but also so _meaningful_ - that using it is a big flag that
you're not just a random driver or something.

So slapping _GPL on some random piece of data that that doesn't
actually imply anything at all for copyright derivation is
fundamentally broken and stupid.

               Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ