linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/9] net: dsa: PTP timestamping for mv88e6xxx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171108032327.7waxpd3thrudcxa6@localhost>
Date:   Tue, 7 Nov 2017 19:23:27 -0800
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Brandon Streiff <brandon.streiff@...com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
        Erik Hons <erik.hons@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/9] net: dsa: PTP timestamping for mv88e6xxx

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 04:02:26AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> So i did a quick test. If the application joins 224.0.1.129 on the
> slave interface, the switch will pass the packets to the host and to
> the application.

The application does join that group on the external (slave)
interface.  I'll find out why the delay request mechanism isn't
working...

Thanks,
Richard