linux-kernel - [PATCH] mmc: slot-gpio: call gpiod_to_irq() only when MMC_CAP_NEEDS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1510122894-9296-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Date:   Wed,  8 Nov 2017 15:34:54 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: slot-gpio: call gpiod_to_irq() only when MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL is unset

It is not efficient to call gpiod_to_irq() regardless the flag, then
ignore the returned irq if MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL.

Move gpiod_to_irq() after the MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL check.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
---

 drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c b/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c
index 863f1db..f7c6e05 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c
@@ -121,20 +121,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_gpio_request_ro);
 void mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq(struct mmc_host *host)
 {
 	struct mmc_gpio *ctx = host->slot.handler_priv;
-	int ret, irq;
+	int irq = -EINVAL;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (host->slot.cd_irq >= 0 || !ctx || !ctx->cd_gpio)
 		return;
 
-	irq = gpiod_to_irq(ctx->cd_gpio);
-
 	/*
-	 * Even if gpiod_to_irq() returns a valid IRQ number, the platform might
-	 * still prefer to poll, e.g., because that IRQ number is already used
-	 * by another unit and cannot be shared.
+	 * Do not use IRQ if the platform prefers to poll, e.g., because that
+	 * IRQ number is already used by another unit and cannot be shared.
 	 */
-	if (irq >= 0 && host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL)
-		irq = -EINVAL;
+	if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL))
+		irq = gpiod_to_irq(ctx->cd_gpio);
 
 	if (irq >= 0) {
 		if (!ctx->cd_gpio_isr)
-- 
2.7.4