[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171108084005.GB13350@u40b0340c692b58f6553c.ant.amazon.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 00:40:05 -0800
From: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Juergen Gross" <jgross@...e.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/pvqspinlock: Hybrid PV queued/unfair locks
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:18:06PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> Currently, all the lock waiters entering the slowpath will do one
> lock stealing attempt to acquire the lock. That helps performance,
> especially in VMs with over-committed vCPUs. However, the current
> pvqspinlocks still don't perform as good as unfair locks in many cases.
> On the other hands, unfair locks do have the problem of lock starvation
> that pvqspinlocks don't have.
>
> This patch combines the best attributes of an unfair lock and a
> pvqspinlock into a hybrid lock with 2 modes - queued mode & unfair
> mode. A lock waiter goes into the unfair mode when there are waiters
> in the wait queue but the pending bit isn't set. Otherwise, it will
> go into the queued mode waiting in the queue for its turn.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>
--
All the best,
Eduardo Valentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists