[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171108084547.GC13350@u40b0340c692b58f6553c.ant.amazon.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 00:45:47 -0800
From: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
CC: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>, <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Matt Wilson <msw@...zon.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jan H . Schoenherr" <jschoenh@...zon.de>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/1] locking/qspinlock/x86: Avoid test-and-set when
PV_DEDICATED is set
Paolo,
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 01:43:15PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 07/11/2017 13:39, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> >> is this still needed after Waiman's patch to adaptively switch between
> >> tas and pvqspinlock?
> > Can you please point me to it ? Is it already in tip/master?
> >
>
> No, he just posted it:
>
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150972337909996&w=2
OK, Thanks. I've reviewed his V2. I think the patch to have PV_DEDICATED is still interesting to have,
for the case the guest is in autoselect mode and honors what the host gives as hints.
>
> Paolo
--
All the best,
Eduardo Valentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists