linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] PCI: hv: use effective affinity mask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 8 Nov 2017 00:51:30 +0000
From:   Jake Oshins <jakeo@...rosoft.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC:     Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        "devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Jork Loeser <Jork.Loeser@...rosoft.com>,
        "Chris Valean (Cloudbase Solutions SRL)" <v-chvale@...rosoft.com>,
        "Adrian Suhov (Cloudbase Solutions SRL)" <v-adsuho@...rosoft.com>,
        Simon Xiao <sixiao@...rosoft.com>,
        'Eyal Mizrachi' <eyalmi@...lanox.com>,
        "Jack Morgenstein" <jackm@...lanox.com>,
        Armen Guezalian <armeng@...lanox.com>,
        Firas Mahameed <firas@...lanox.com>,
        Tziporet Koren <tziporet@...lanox.com>,
        Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...lanox.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] PCI: hv: use effective affinity mask

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@...nel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2017 4:15 PM
> To: Jake Oshins <jakeo@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>; Bjorn Helgaas
> <bhelgaas@...gle.com>; linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; KY Srinivasan
> <kys@...rosoft.com>; Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>;
> devel@...uxdriverproject.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Haiyang Zhang
> <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>; Jork Loeser <Jork.Loeser@...rosoft.com>;
> Chris Valean (Cloudbase Solutions SRL) <v-chvale@...rosoft.com>; Adrian
> Suhov (Cloudbase Solutions SRL) <v-adsuho@...rosoft.com>; Simon Xiao
> <sixiao@...rosoft.com>; 'Eyal Mizrachi' <eyalmi@...lanox.com>; Jack
> Morgenstein <jackm@...lanox.com>; Armen Guezalian
> <armeng@...lanox.com>; Firas Mahameed <firas@...lanox.com>;
> Tziporet Koren <tziporet@...lanox.com>; Daniel Jurgens
> <danielj@...lanox.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: hv: use effective affinity mask
> 
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 08:52:56PM +0000, Jake Oshins wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dexuan Cui
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 1:31 PM
> > > To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>; linux-pci@...r.kernel.org;
> > > Jake Oshins <jakeo@...rosoft.com>; KY Srinivasan
> > > <kys@...rosoft.com>; Stephen Hemminger
> <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
> > > Cc: devel@...uxdriverproject.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> > > Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>; Jork Loeser
> > > <Jork.Loeser@...rosoft.com>; Chris Valean (Cloudbase Solutions SRL)
> > > <v- chvale@...rosoft.com>; Adrian Suhov (Cloudbase Solutions SRL)
> > > <v- adsuho@...rosoft.com>; Simon Xiao <sixiao@...rosoft.com>; 'Eyal
> > > Mizrachi' <eyalmi@...lanox.com>; Jack Morgenstein
> > > <jackm@...lanox.com>; Armen Guezalian <armeng@...lanox.com>;
> Firas
> > > Mahameed <firas@...lanox.com>; Tziporet Koren
> > > <tziporet@...lanox.com>; Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...lanox.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH] PCI: hv: use effective affinity mask
> > >
> > >
> > > The effective_affinity_mask is always set when an interrupt is
> > > assigned in
> > > __assign_irq_vector() -> apic->cpu_mask_to_apicid(), e.g. for struct
> > > apic
> > > apic_physflat: -> default_cpu_mask_to_apicid() ->
> > > irq_data_update_effective_affinity(), but it looks
> > > d->common->affinity remains all-1's before the user space or the kernel
> changes it later.
> > >
> > > In the early allocation/initialization phase of an irq, we should
> > > use the effective_affinity_mask, otherwise Hyper-V may not deliver
> > > the interrupt to the expected cpu. Without the patch, if we assign 7
> > > Mellanox ConnectX-3 VFs to a 32-vCPU VM, one of the VFs may fail to
> receive interrupts.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
> > > Cc: Jake Oshins <jakeo@...rosoft.com>
> > > Cc: Jork Loeser <jloeser@...rosoft.com>
> > > Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
> > > Cc: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Please consider this for v4.14, if it's not too late.
> > >
> > >  drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c | 8 +++++---
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> > > b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c index 5ccb47d..8b5f66d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> > > @@ -879,7 +879,7 @@ static void hv_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
> > >  	int cpu;
> > >  	u64 res;
> > >
> > > -	dest = irq_data_get_affinity_mask(data);
> > > +	dest = irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(data);
> > >  	pdev = msi_desc_to_pci_dev(msi_desc);
> > >  	pbus = pdev->bus;
> > >  	hbus = container_of(pbus->sysdata, struct hv_pcibus_device,
> > > sysdata); @@ -1042,6 +1042,7 @@ static void
> > > hv_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
> > >  	struct hv_pci_dev *hpdev;
> > >  	struct pci_bus *pbus;
> > >  	struct pci_dev *pdev;
> > > +	struct cpumask *dest;
> > >  	struct compose_comp_ctxt comp;
> > >  	struct tran_int_desc *int_desc;
> > >  	struct {
> > > @@ -1056,6 +1057,7 @@ static void hv_compose_msi_msg(struct
> irq_data
> > > *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
> > >  	int ret;
> > >
> > >  	pdev = msi_desc_to_pci_dev(irq_data_get_msi_desc(data));
> > > +	dest = irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(data);
> > >  	pbus = pdev->bus;
> > >  	hbus = container_of(pbus->sysdata, struct hv_pcibus_device,
> > > sysdata);
> > >  	hpdev = get_pcichild_wslot(hbus, devfn_to_wslot(pdev->devfn));
> @@
> > > -1081,14 +1083,14 @@ static void hv_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data
> > > *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
> > >  	switch (pci_protocol_version) {
> > >  	case PCI_PROTOCOL_VERSION_1_1:
> > >  		size = hv_compose_msi_req_v1(&ctxt.int_pkts.v1,
> > > -					irq_data_get_affinity_mask(data),
> > > +					dest,
> > >  					hpdev->desc.win_slot.slot,
> > >  					cfg->vector);
> > >  		break;
> > >
> > >  	case PCI_PROTOCOL_VERSION_1_2:
> > >  		size = hv_compose_msi_req_v2(&ctxt.int_pkts.v2,
> > > -					irq_data_get_affinity_mask(data),
> > > +					dest,
> > >  					hpdev->desc.win_slot.slot,
> > >  					cfg->vector);
> > >  		break;
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jake Oshins <jakeo@...rosoft.com>
> 
> I'm not sure what this means.
> 
> Per Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst, "Signed-off-by"
> means you were "involved in the development of the patch, or that he/she
> was in the patch's delivery path."  You weren't in the delivery path (I got it
> from Dexuan), and if you were involved in development, your Signed-off-by
> would normally appear in the original posting.
> 
> Should this be a Reviewed-by tag?

Sorry.  I forgot the protocol.  I'll fix that.

Reviewed-by: Jake Oshins <jakeo@...rosoft.com>