lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f79f75f-1b6a-3f7b-b0c0-f970f0fb6c12@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Nov 2017 10:42:03 +0000
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Roy Franz <roy.franz@...ium.com>,
        Harb Abdulhamid <harba@...eaurora.org>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Loc Ho <lho@....com>, Ryan Harkin <Ryan.Harkin@....com>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 20/20] cpufreq: scmi: add support for fast frequency
 switching



On 08/11/17 00:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, November 3, 2017 3:47:57 PM CET Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> The cpufreq core provides option for drivers to implement fast_switch
>> callback which is invoked for frequency switching from interrupt context.
>>
>> This patch adds support for fast_switch callback in SCMI cpufreq driver
>> by making use of polling based SCMI transfer. It also sets the flag
>> fast_switch_possible.
>>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> 
> I'm assuming that this material will go in along with the rest of the series
> through a different tree.
> 

Indeed, I will ask ARM-SoC guys to take it via their tree when ready. I
assume you are fine with that, please provide ack if that's still the case.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ