linux-kernel - [tip:x86/asm] selftests/x86: Add tests for the STR and SLDT instructions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-a9e017d5619eb371460c8e516f4684def62bef3a@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 8 Nov 2017 03:02:30 -0800
From:   tip-bot for Ricardo Neri <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, ray.huang@....com,
        peterz@...radead.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...e.de,
        cmetcalf@...lanox.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
        ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
        jslaby@...e.cz, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, corbet@....net,
        brgerst@...il.com, hpa@...or.com, bp@...en8.de,
        paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, mst@...hat.com,
        ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jpoimboe@...hat.com, dvlasenk@...hat.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
        slaoub@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: [tip:x86/asm] selftests/x86: Add tests for the STR and SLDT
 instructions

Commit-ID:  a9e017d5619eb371460c8e516f4684def62bef3a
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/a9e017d5619eb371460c8e516f4684def62bef3a
Author:     Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 18:27:57 -0800
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 11:16:25 +0100

selftests/x86: Add tests for the STR and SLDT instructions

The STR and SLDT instructions are not valid when running on virtual-8086
mode and generate an invalid operand exception. These two instructions are
protected by the Intel User-Mode Instruction Prevention (UMIP) security
feature. In protected mode, if UMIP is enabled, these instructions generate
a general protection fault if called from CPL > 0. Linux traps the general
protection fault and emulates the instructions sgdt, sidt and smsw; but not
str and sldt.

These tests are added to verify that the emulation code does not emulate
these two instructions but the expected invalid operand exception is
seen.

Tests fallback to exit with INT3 in case emulation does happen.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: ricardo.neri@...el.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509935277-22138-13-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c
index f7d9cea..361466a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c
@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ asm (
 	"smsw %ax\n\t"
 	"mov %ax, (2080)\n\t"
 	"int3\n\t"
+	"vmcode_umip_str:\n\t"
+	"str %eax\n\t"
+	"vmcode_umip_sldt:\n\t"
+	"sldt %eax\n\t"
+	"int3\n\t"
 	".size vmcode, . - vmcode\n\t"
 	"end_vmcode:\n\t"
 	".code32\n\t"
@@ -119,7 +124,8 @@ asm (
 
 extern unsigned char vmcode[], end_vmcode[];
 extern unsigned char vmcode_bound[], vmcode_sysenter[], vmcode_syscall[],
-	vmcode_sti[], vmcode_int3[], vmcode_int80[], vmcode_umip[];
+	vmcode_sti[], vmcode_int3[], vmcode_int80[], vmcode_umip[],
+	vmcode_umip_str[], vmcode_umip_sldt[];
 
 /* Returns false if the test was skipped. */
 static bool do_test(struct vm86plus_struct *v86, unsigned long eip,
@@ -226,6 +232,16 @@ void do_umip_tests(struct vm86plus_struct *vm86, unsigned char *test_mem)
 		printf("[FAIL]\tAll the results of SIDT should be the same.\n");
 	else
 		printf("[PASS]\tAll the results from SIDT are identical.\n");
+
+	sethandler(SIGILL, sighandler, 0);
+	do_test(vm86, vmcode_umip_str - vmcode, VM86_SIGNAL, 0,
+		"STR instruction");
+	clearhandler(SIGILL);
+
+	sethandler(SIGILL, sighandler, 0);
+	do_test(vm86, vmcode_umip_sldt - vmcode, VM86_SIGNAL, 0,
+		"SLDT instruction");
+	clearhandler(SIGILL);
 }
 
 int main(void)