[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a083zZnN1rZOV6Ox_pR24YJf9MCZiNV4KmpuTiMV_F8eA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 15:10:18 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Harsha Priya N <harshapriya.n@...el.com>,
Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
Naveen M <naveen.m@...el.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: Intel: improve DMADEVICES dependency
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 02:03:19PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> As pointed out by Pierre-Louis Bossart, the depndency I added
>
> /s/depndency/dependency
Mark, can you fix that up when applying, or should I resend?
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig b/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig
>> index e18118209b75..bb8be10b8437 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig
>> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig
>> @@ -32,19 +32,20 @@ config SND_SOC_ACPI_INTEL_MATCH
>> config SND_SOC_INTEL_SST_TOPLEVEL
>> tristate "Intel ASoC SST drivers"
>> depends on X86 || COMPILE_TEST
>> - depends on DMADEVICES
>> select SND_SOC_INTEL_MACH
>> select SND_SOC_INTEL_COMMON
>>
>> config SND_SOC_INTEL_HASWELL
>> tristate "Intel ASoC SST driver for Haswell/Broadwell"
>> depends on SND_SOC_INTEL_SST_TOPLEVEL && SND_DMA_SGBUF
>> + depends on DMADEVICES
>> select SND_SOC_INTEL_SST
>> select SND_SOC_INTEL_SST_FIRMWARE
>>
>> --- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/Kconfig
>> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/Kconfig
>> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ config SND_SOC_INTEL_HASWELL_MACH
>> tristate "ASoC Audio DSP support for Intel Haswell Lynxpoint"
>> depends on SND_SOC_INTEL_MACH
>> depends on X86_INTEL_LPSS && I2C && I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
>> - depends on DMADEVICES
>
> Per Liam this seems to be required for Haswell
>
>
>> depends on SND_SOC_INTEL_HASWELL
Correct, I just moved it to a different place above, we now get it through
the SND_SOC_INTEL_HASWELL dependency.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists