[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1b-LBhvYPFKj7bQ4TT5dcfGvRChNizO4cNmtz1tW86xw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 15:54:15 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Y2038] [PATCH 2/2] alpha: osf_sys.c: use timespec64 where appropriate
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Ben Hutchings
<ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-11-07 at 15:09 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Some of the syscall helper functions (do_utimes, poll_select_set_timeout,
>> core_sys_select) have changed over the past year or two to use
>> 'timespec64' pointers rather than 'timespec'. This was fine on alpha,
>> since 64-bit architectures treat the two as the same type.
>>
>> However, I'd like to change that behavior and make 'timespec64' a proper
>> type of its own even on 64-bit architectures, and that will introduce
>> harmless type mismatch warnings here.
>>
>> Also, I'm trying to kill off the do_gettimeofday() helper in favor of
>> ktime_get() and related interfaces throughout the kernel.
> [...]
>> @@ -1004,9 +1013,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(osf_gettimeofday, struct timeval32 __user *, tv,
>> struct timezone __user *, tz)
>> {
>> if (tv) {
>> - struct timeval ktv;
>> - do_gettimeofday(&ktv);
>> - if (put_tv32(tv, &ktv))
>> + struct timespec64 kts;
>> +
>> + ktime_get_ts64(&kts);
> [...]
>
> But this syscall is supposed to use the realtime clock, no? It seems
> like the correct substitute here is getnstimeofday64() (as the kernel-
> doc comment for do_gettimeofday() *almost* says).
It should be ktime_get_real_ts64(), thanks for noticing my mistake.
ktime_get_real_ts64() is the same as getnstimeofday64(), but I'm
trying to use the ktime_get* naming where possible.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists