[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eeb892dd-3b21-e43c-ae97-745b7b69fa29@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 09:16:02 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Cc: Joshua Abraham <j.abraham1776@...il.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: fsl-dpaa2: Fix multiple assignments should be
avoided
On 11/08/2017 03:39 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 12:40 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:20:48AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 07:45:03PM -0500, Joshua Abraham wrote:
>>>> This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning:
>>>> "CHECK: multiple assignments should be avoided"
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Joshua Abraham <j.abraham1776@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c | 3 ++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c
>>>> index 0d8ed002adcb..384218946108 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c
>>>> @@ -1661,7 +1661,8 @@ static void set_fq_affinity(struct dpaa2_eth_priv *priv)
>>>> * This may well change at runtime, either through irqbalance or
>>>> * through direct user intervention.
>>>> */
>>>> - rx_cpu = txc_cpu = cpumask_first(&priv->dpio_cpumask);
>>>> + rx_cpu = cpumask_first(&priv->dpio_cpumask);
>>>> + txc_cpu = rx_cpu;
>>>
>>> The original code here makes much more sense, doesn't it?
>>>
>>> Sometimes checkpatch is wrong :)
>>
>> It feels like the majority of these multiple assignment warnings are
>> wrong. I thought it would be a good idea at first but after looking at
>> a bunch of the patches it feels like we should just remove the check.
>
> I don't have a particular opinion one way or another.
>
> That bit was added to CodingStyle by Randy Dunlap back
> in 2006 by
>
> commit b3fc9941fbc6efe5cb77728adb0fb12be363e73e
> Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> Date: Sun Dec 10 02:18:56 2006 -0800
>
> [PATCH] CodingStyle updates
>
> Add some kernel coding style comments, mostly pulled from emails
> by Andrew Morton, Jesper Juhl, and Randy Dunlap.
>
> - add paragraph on switch/case indentation (with fixes)
> - add paragraph on multiple-assignments
> - add more on Braces
> - add section on Spaces; add typeof, alignof, & __attribute__ with sizeof;
> add more on postfix/prefix increment/decrement operators
> - add paragraph on function breaks in source files; add info on
> function prototype parameter names
> - add paragraph on EXPORT_SYMBOL placement
> - add section on /*-comment style, long-comment style, and data
> declarations and comments
> - correct some chapter number references that were missed when
> chapters were renumbered
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> Acked-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@....de>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
So it was. I would certainly support removing it.
I suspect I copied that from someone else's email. My personal style
would be to allow that.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists