[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171108173808.GH20756@reaktio.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 19:38:08 +0200
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@....fi>
To: Govinda Tatti <govinda.tatti@...cle.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xen/pciback: Implement PCI slot or bus reset
with 'do_flr' SysFS attribute
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 09:44:48AM -0600, Govinda Tatti wrote:
> Thanks Jan for your review comments. Please see below for my comments.
>
> On 11/7/2017 8:40 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>>On 06.11.17 at 18:48, <Govinda.Tatti@...cle.COM> wrote:
> >>--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-pciback
> >>+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-pciback
> >>@@ -11,3 +11,15 @@ Description:
> >> #echo 00:19.0-E0:2:FF > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/pciback/quirks
> >> will allow the guest to read and write to the configuration
> >> register 0x0E.
> >>+
> >>+What: /sys/bus/pci/drivers/pciback/do_flr
> >>+Date: Nov 2017
> >>+KernelVersion: 4.15
> >>+Contact: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
> >>+Description:
> >>+ An option to perform a slot or bus reset when a PCI device
> >>+ is owned by Xen PCI backend. Writing a string of DDDD:BB:DD.F
> >>+ will cause the pciback driver to perform a slot or bus reset
> >>+ if the device supports it. It also checks to make sure that
> >>+ all of the devices under the bridge are owned by Xen PCI
> >>+ backend.
> >Why do you name this "do_flr" when you don't even try FLR, but
> >go to slot or then bus reset right away.
> Yes, I agree but xen toolstack has already been modified to consume"do_flr"
> attribute. Hence, we are using the
> function that matches with sysfs attribute.
>
Hmm.. I remember some discussion from ages ago related to this.
Back then it was suggested to "emulate" the flr capability (by doing slot or bus reset) for devices which don't have *native* flr available? So is this patch perhaps related to that?
If the PCI device in question has native flr capability, then native flr is used, right ?
I guess I should read the full patch..
-- Pasi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists