[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1086045224.63286.1510166797078@email.1und1.de>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 19:46:37 +0100 (CET)
From: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>,
Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar@...il.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] hwrng: bcm2835-rng: Rework interrupt masking
Hi Florian,
> Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> hat am 8. November 2017 um 01:44 geschrieben:
>
>
> The interrupt masking done for Northstart Plus and Northstar (BCM5301X)
> is moved from being a function pointer mapped to of_device_id::data into
> a proper part of the hwrng::init callback. While at it, we also make the
> of_data be a proper structure indicating the platform specifics, since
> the day we need to add a second type of platform information, we would
> have to do that anyway.
in the lack of proper documentation for bcm2835 rng, is it possible that we should mask the interrupts for bcm2835 as well?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists