linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] apparmor: fix off-by-one comparison on MAXMAPPED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFz=fim-At4bdVz0Jte8WNU2BwUk_DHMw53hnpY+Q7LuSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Nov 2017 10:53:58 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Cc:     LKLM <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] apparmor: fix off-by-one comparison on MAXMAPPED_SIG

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:09 AM, John Johansen
<john.johansen@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>

This sign-off chain is odd. It implies that the patch came from Colin
King, bnut it lacks authorship attribution.

So who authored this?

If it was Colin, there should have been a

    From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>

at the top.

So either the authorship is broken, or the sign-off chain is. Which is it?

              Linus