lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 9 Nov 2017 22:29:45 +0100
From:   Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     sre@...nel.org, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com, khilman@...nel.org,
        aaro.koskinen@....fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com,
        patrikbachan@...il.com, serge@...lyn.com, abcloriens@...il.com,
        clayton@...ftyguy.net, martijn@...xit.nl,
        sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com, afd@...com, kernel@...workimprov.net,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for bq27521 battery monitor

On Thursday 09 November 2017 22:06:15 Pavel Machek wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c b/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c
> index ed44439..ee2851a 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c
> @@ -381,6 +381,30 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = {
>  		[BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = INVALID_REG_ADDR,
>  		BQ27XXX_DM_REG_ROWS,
>  	},
> +	[BQ27521] = {				/* FIXME */
> +		[BQ27XXX_REG_CTRL] = 0x02,
> +		[BQ27XXX_REG_TEMP] = 0x0a,
> +		[BQ27XXX_REG_INT_TEMP] = INVALID_REG_ADDR,
> +		[BQ27XXX_REG_VOLT] = 0x0c,
> +		[BQ27XXX_REG_AI] = 0x0e,
> +		[BQ27XXX_REG_FLAGS] = 0x08,
> +		[BQ27XXX_REG_TTE] = INVALID_REG_ADDR,
> +		[BQ27XXX_REG_TTF] = INVALID_REG_ADDR,
> +		[BQ27XXX_REG_TTES] = INVALID_REG_ADDR,
> +		[BQ27XXX_REG_TTECP] = INVALID_REG_ADDR,
> +		[BQ27XXX_REG_NAC] = INVALID_REG_ADDR,
> +		[BQ27XXX_REG_FCC] = INVALID_REG_ADDR,
> +		[BQ27XXX_REG_CYCT] = INVALID_REG_ADDR,
> +		[BQ27XXX_REG_AE] = INVALID_REG_ADDR,
> +		[BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = INVALID_REG_ADDR,
> +		[BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = INVALID_REG_ADDR,
> +		[BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = INVALID_REG_ADDR,
> +		[BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = INVALID_REG_ADDR,
> +		[BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = INVALID_REG_ADDR,
> +		[BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = INVALID_REG_ADDR,
> +		[BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = INVALID_REG_ADDR,
> +		[BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = INVALID_REG_ADDR,
> +	},
>  	[BQ27530] = {
>  		[BQ27XXX_REG_CTRL] = 0x00,
>  		[BQ27XXX_REG_TEMP] = 0x06,

Hi! IIRC those registers are valid only for sn27521 chip in revision 14
(or new). For older revision is used different register map. And
detection of chip revision is somehow possible via some registers.

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ