linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/intel_sdvo: mark expected switch fall-throughs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87wp2zammy.fsf@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 09 Nov 2017 10:20:53 +0200
From:   Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc:     intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/intel_sdvo: mark expected switch fall-throughs

On Wed, 08 Nov 2017, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com> wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141432
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141433
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141434
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141435
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141436
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>

Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
> index 7437944..921e372 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
> @@ -1327,6 +1327,7 @@ static void intel_sdvo_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder,
>  	switch (crtc_state->pixel_multiplier) {
>  	default:
>  		WARN(1, "unknown pixel multiplier specified\n");
> +		/* fall through */
>  	case 1: rate = SDVO_CLOCK_RATE_MULT_1X; break;
>  	case 2: rate = SDVO_CLOCK_RATE_MULT_2X; break;
>  	case 4: rate = SDVO_CLOCK_RATE_MULT_4X; break;
> @@ -2274,15 +2275,15 @@ intel_sdvo_guess_ddc_bus(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo)
>  	 */
>  	switch (sdvo->controlled_output) {
>  	case SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS1:
> -		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS1;
> +		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS1; /* fall through */
>  	case SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS0:
> -		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS0;
> +		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS0; /* fall through */
>  	case SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS1:
> -		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS1;
> +		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS1; /* fall through */
>  	case SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS0:
> -		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS0;
> +		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS0; /* fall through */
>  	case SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB1:
> -		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB1;
> +		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB1; /* fall through */
>  	case SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB0:
>  		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB0;
>  		break;

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center