[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01a09219-c348-5aa5-c052-c8ea505c769d@egil-hjelmeland.no>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 10:04:46 +0100
From: Egil Hjelmeland <privat@...l-hjelmeland.no>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] net: dsa: remove trans argument from mdb ops
On 08. nov. 2017 18:19, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> The DSA switch MDB ops pass the switchdev_trans structure down to the
> drivers, but no one is using them and they aren't supposed to anyway.
>
> Remove the trans argument from MDB prepare and add operations.
>
> - int (*port_mdb_prepare)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> - const struct switchdev_obj_port_mdb *mdb,
> - struct switchdev_trans *trans);
> - void (*port_mdb_add)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> - const struct switchdev_obj_port_mdb *mdb,
> - struct switchdev_trans *trans);
> + int (*port_mdb_prepare)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> + const struct switchdev_obj_port_mdb *mdb);
> + void (*port_mdb_add)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> + const struct switchdev_obj_port_mdb *mdb);
> int (*port_mdb_del)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> const struct switchdev_obj_port_mdb *mdb);
Hi Vivien
Nice to get rid of "trans". I recall I was confused by this parameter.
"Am I supposed to do something with this parameter?".
But when at it. What about getting rid of switchdev_obj_port_mdb, making
similar signatures as the new .port_fdb_xxx functions? Would that make
sense?
Egil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists