[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201711091922.IHJ81787.OVQFFJOSOLtHMF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 19:22:58 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: mhocko@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
dave.hansen@...el.com, hannes@...xchg.org, mgorman@...e.de,
pmladek@...e.com, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
peterz@...radead.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jack@...e.cz,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, rostedt@...e.goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] printk: Add console owner and waiter logic to loadbalance console writes
Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hi,
> assuming that this passes warn stall torturing by Tetsuo, do you think
> we can drop http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509017339-4802-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
> from the mmotm tree?
I don't think so.
The rule that "do not try to printk() faster than the kernel can write to
consoles" will remain no matter how printk() changes. Unless asynchronous
approach like https://lwn.net/Articles/723447/ is used, I think we can't
obtain useful information.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists