[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <868353d9-5972-c6e8-02ed-6f9010c3e40f@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 11:03:45 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, cdall@...aro.org,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] Add support for clang LTO
On 09/11/17 10:54, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 02:13:04AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 12:56:47PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 07:26:35PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>> I guess that in Google you haven't tested on a platform with EL2
>>>> available?
>>>
>>> Correct. I'll look into this and include a fix in v2. Does this work on a
>>> clang build without LTO?
>>
>> I saw this on v4.14-rc7, with patch 7 (-mno-implicit-float), but no other
>> patches from this series (i.e. no LTO).
>
>
> Add -fno-jump-tables to ccflags-y of arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/Makefile.
> Without this option, clang generates a branch instruction (br x11)
> to an absolute (EL1) virtual address.
Instead of adding more compiler flags to the Makefile, is there any way
to have that as a function attribute?
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists