[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171109111424.GA18787@amd>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 12:14:25 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
jeyu@...nel.org, pmladek@...e.com, lpechacek@...e.cz,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] livepatch: force transition process to finish
On Mon 2017-11-06 13:03:32, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > NAK. Admin does not have chance to decide if this is safe or not.
>
> The process that is actually being suggested here (and towards which the
> implementation is heading) is that in case of the convergence being stuck
> for unknown reason, the admin of the system collects all the necessary
> data (namely stacktraces of the relevant tasks), and requests a clearance
> from the livepatch distributor to force the transition.
>
> But I agree with you that this might not be completely clear from the
> documentation, and should be made more explicit.
Yes, please.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists