lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 9 Nov 2017 12:14:25 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc:     Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
        jeyu@...nel.org, pmladek@...e.com, lpechacek@...e.cz,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] livepatch: force transition process to finish

On Mon 2017-11-06 13:03:32, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> > NAK. Admin does not have chance to decide if this is safe or not.
> 
> The process that is actually being suggested here (and towards which the 
> implementation is heading) is that in case of the convergence being stuck 
> for unknown reason, the admin of the system collects all the necessary 
> data (namely stacktraces of the relevant tasks), and requests a clearance 
> from the livepatch distributor to force the transition.
> 
> But I agree with you that this might not be completely clear from the 
> documentation, and should be made more explicit.

Yes, please.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists