[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171109132719.GA6829@x4>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:27:19 +0100
From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Add reject option for parse-events.l
On 2017.11.09 at 10:22 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 09:17:49AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > Reply-To:
> > In-Reply-To: <20171109081319.GB236@x4>
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 09:13:19AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > On 2017.11.05 at 15:40 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > util/parse-events.l:343:26: note: in expansion of macro ‘USER_REJECT’
> > > {bpf_source} { if (!isbpf(yyscanner)) USER_REJECT; return str(yyscanner, PE_BPF_SOURCE); }
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > > mv: cannot stat 'util/.parse-events-flex.o.tmp': No such file or directory
> >
> > sry, we have a fix in queue already
>
> yeah, I noticed it while building for Alpine Linux 3.6 and Edge, that
> have flex 2.6.4, which is newer than what is in the other distros,
> ubuntu, debian, fedora, even their experimental ones (rawhide, etc),
> out of curiosity, what distro do you use and what flex version does it
> use?
In my case: Gentoo and flex-2.6.4.
--
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists