[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171109135009.w2rnshuttqdx5h52@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:50:09 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
ricardo.neri@...el.com,
Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 13/18] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get
segment selector
* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Ricardo Neri
> <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/inat.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/inat.h
> > index 02aff08..1c78580 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/inat.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/inat.h
> > @@ -97,6 +97,16 @@
> > #define INAT_MAKE_GROUP(grp) ((grp << INAT_GRP_OFFS) | INAT_MODRM)
> > #define INAT_MAKE_IMM(imm) (imm << INAT_IMM_OFFS)
> >
> > +/* Identifiers for segment registers */
> > +#define INAT_SEG_REG_IGNORE 0
> > +#define INAT_SEG_REG_DEFAULT 1
> > +#define INAT_SEG_REG_CS 2
> > +#define INAT_SEG_REG_SS 3
> > +#define INAT_SEG_REG_DS 4
> > +#define INAT_SEG_REG_ES 5
> > +#define INAT_SEG_REG_FS 6
> > +#define INAT_SEG_REG_GS 7
> > +
>
> linux-next still reports a warning because of this change:
>
> Warning: synced file at 'tools/objtool/arch/x86/include/asm/inat.h'
> differs from latest kernel version at 'arch/x86/include/asm/inat.h'
>
> Should the same change be applied to the objtool file in the
> tip:x86/mpx branch?
No, the best flow is that the headers will be synced once both components are
upstream.
This is an integration artifact - and we don't want to 'pre sync', because what
happens if Linus has to reject the arch/x86/include/asm/inat.h changes for
whatever reason, and the tooling changes go upstream first?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists