linux-kernel - Re: n900 in next-20170901

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171109150854.GC28152@atomide.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Nov 2017 07:08:54 -0800
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, pali.rohar@...il.com, sre@...nel.org,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, khilman@...nel.org,
        aaro.koskinen@....fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com,
        patrikbachan@...il.com, serge@...lyn.com, abcloriens@...il.com,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: n900 in next-20170901

* Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> [171109 03:47]:
> Could you test following two commits on my updated branch?
> 
> "arm/dma: vmalloc area allocation"

Won't boot at this commit:

[    6.747283] save_secure_sram() returns 0000ff02
[    6.751983] save_secure_sram()'s param: 0: 0x4
[    6.756561] save_secure_sram()'s param: 1: 0x8e700000
[    6.761749] save_secure_sram()'s param: 2: 0x0
[    6.766326] save_secure_sram()'s param: 3: 0x1
[    6.770904] save_secure_sram()'s param: 4: 0x1

> "arm/dma: defer atomic pool initialization"

Boots at this commit.

> I suspect that changed virtual address of the sram due to early
> __dma_alloc_remap() call causes the problem and above two commits test
> this theory.

Hmm OK. Does your first patch above now have the initcall issue too?
It boots if I make that also subsys_initcall and then I get:

[    2.078094] vmalloc_pool_init: DMA: get vmalloc area: d0010000

Regards,

Tony