[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171109164342.GR15235@jhogan-linux>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 16:43:43 +0000
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@...s.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
CC: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] watchdog: jz4780: Allow selection of jz4740-wdt
driver
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 08:01:47AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 07:47:19AM +0000, James Hogan wrote:
> > Hi Wim,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 08:35:54PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > > This driver works for jz4740 & jz4780
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
> >
> > I just noticed that though Ralf applied the other two patches in this
> > series (defconfig + dt), he hadn't applied this patch.
> >
> > Please can we have an ack from a watchdog maintainer so this can get
> > into 4.15 via the MIPS tree? It could alternatively go via the watchdog
> > tree if you prefer.
> >
>
> FWIW, according to my logs I did send out a Reviewed-by: some time ago,
> which normally means that I expect it to go through the watchdog tree.
> I wasn't aware that you wanted the patch to go through the mips tree.
> Sorry if I missed that earlier. For the record,
>
> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>
> since I don't care one way or another.
Okay thanks, I wasn't sure and don't much mind which way it goes.
>
> I assume you want me to drop this and the related patches from my own
> watchdpog-next tree to prevent it from showing up in Wim's tree (if
> it isn't already there). Is that correct ?
I haven't seen this patch in linux-next, or I wouldn't have mentioned
it. If its already in some staging tree for 4.15 that I've missed then
it may as well stay there, otherwise I'll just take it through the MIPS
tree with your ack.
Cheers
James
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists