| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2ee7e355941f4ef5a244f152d4953753@ausx13mpc120.AMER.DELL.COM>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 17:34:39 +0000
From: <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>
To: <pali.rohar@...il.com>
CC: <dvhart@...radead.org>, <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86: dell-*wmi*: Relay failed initial probe
to dependent drivers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: platform-driver-x86-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:platform-driver-x86-
> owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Pali Rohár
> Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 11:29 AM
> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@...l.com>
> Cc: dvhart@...radead.org; andy.shevchenko@...il.com; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86: dell-*wmi*: Relay failed initial probe to
> dependent drivers
>
> On Thursday 09 November 2017 16:13:52 Mario.Limonciello@...l.com wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Pali Rohár [mailto:pali.rohar@...il.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 10:03 AM
> > > To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@...l.com>
> > > Cc: dvhart@...radead.org; Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>;
> > > LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86: dell-*wmi*: Relay failed initial probe to
> > > dependent drivers
> > >
> > > On Friday 03 November 2017 11:27:22 Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > > > dell-wmi and dell-smbios-wmi are dependent upon dell-wmi-descriptor
> > > > finishing probe successfully to probe themselves.
> > > >
> > > > Currently if dell-wmi-descriptor fails probing in a non-recoverable way
> > > > (such as invalid header) dell-wmi and dell-smbios-wmi will continue to
> > > > try to redo probing due to deferred probing.
> > > >
> > > > To solve this have the dependent drivers query the dell-wmi-descriptor
> > > > driver whether the descriptor has been determined valid. The possible
> > > > results are:
> > > > -EPROBE_DEFER: Descriptor not yet probed, dependent driver should wait
> > > > and use deferred probing
> > > > < 0: Descriptor probed, invalid. Dependent driver should return an
> > > > error.
> > > > 0: Successful descriptor probe, dependent driver can continue
> > > >
> > > > Successful descriptor probe still doesn't mean that the descriptor driver
> > > > is necessarily bound at the time of initialization of dependent driver.
> > > > Userspace can unbind the driver, so all methods used from driver
> > > > should still be verified to return success values otherwise deferred
> > > > probing be used.
> > >
> > > Darren, Andy, any comments on this patch?
> > >
> > > I think now it should work also those corner, but legit cases.
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@...l.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/platform/x86/dell-smbios-wmi.c | 4 ++++
> > > > drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > > > drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.h | 7 +++++++
> > > > drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi.c | 5 +++++
> > > > 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-smbios-wmi.c
> b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-
> > > smbios-wmi.c
> > > > index 35c13815b24c..3fa53fa174b2 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-smbios-wmi.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-smbios-wmi.c
> > > > @@ -151,6 +151,10 @@ static int dell_smbios_wmi_probe(struct
> wmi_device
> > > *wdev)
> > > > if (!wmi_has_guid(DELL_WMI_DESCRIPTOR_GUID))
> > > > return -ENODEV;
> > > >
> > > > + ret = dell_wmi_get_descriptor_valid();
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +
> > > > priv = devm_kzalloc(&wdev->dev, sizeof(struct wmi_smbios_priv),
> > > > GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > if (!priv)
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.c
> > > b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.c
> > > > index 28ef5f37cfbf..e7f4c3a7bfc4 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.c
> > > > @@ -26,9 +26,16 @@ struct descriptor_priv {
> > > > u32 interface_version;
> > > > u32 size;
> > > > };
> > > > +static int descriptor_valid = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > > > static LIST_HEAD(wmi_list);
> > > > static DEFINE_MUTEX(list_mutex);
> > > >
> > > > +int dell_wmi_get_descriptor_valid(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return descriptor_valid;
> > > > +}
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dell_wmi_get_descriptor_valid);
> > > > +
> > > > bool dell_wmi_get_interface_version(u32 *version)
> > > > {
> > > > struct descriptor_priv *priv;
> > > > @@ -91,6 +98,7 @@ static int dell_wmi_descriptor_probe(struct wmi_device
> > > *wdev)
> > > > if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
> > > > dev_err(&wdev->dev, "Dell descriptor has wrong type\n");
> > > > ret = -EINVAL;
> > > > + descriptor_valid = ret;
> > > > goto out;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -102,6 +110,7 @@ static int dell_wmi_descriptor_probe(struct
> wmi_device
> > > *wdev)
> > > > "Dell descriptor buffer has unexpected length (%d)\n",
> > > > obj->buffer.length);
> > > > ret = -EINVAL;
> > > > + descriptor_valid = ret;
> > > > goto out;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -111,8 +120,10 @@ static int dell_wmi_descriptor_probe(struct
> wmi_device
> > > *wdev)
> > > > dev_err(&wdev->dev, "Dell descriptor buffer has invalid signature
> > > (%8ph)\n",
> > > > buffer);
> > > > ret = -EINVAL;
> > > > + descriptor_valid = ret;
> > > > goto out;
> > > > }
> > > > + descriptor_valid = 0;
> > > >
> > > > if (buffer[2] != 0 && buffer[2] != 1)
> > > > dev_warn(&wdev->dev, "Dell descriptor buffer has unknown
> > > version (%lu)\n",
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.h
> > > b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.h
> > > > index 5f7b69c2c83a..776cddd5e135 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.h
> > > > @@ -15,6 +15,13 @@
> > > >
> > > > #define DELL_WMI_DESCRIPTOR_GUID "8D9DDCBC-A997-11DA-B012-
> > > B622A1EF5492"
> > > >
> > > > +/* possible return values:
> > > > + * -EPROBE_DEFER: probing for dell-wmi-descriptor not yet run
> > > > + * 0: valid descriptor, successfully probed
> > > > + * < 0: invalid descriptor, don't probe dependent devices
> > > > + */
> > > > +int dell_wmi_get_descriptor_valid(void);
> > > > +
> > > > bool dell_wmi_get_interface_version(u32 *version);
> > > > bool dell_wmi_get_size(u32 *size);
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-
> wmi.c
> > > > index 54321080a30d..bb7c1e681792 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi.c
> > > > @@ -655,10 +655,15 @@ static int dell_wmi_events_set_enabled(bool
> enable)
> > > > static int dell_wmi_probe(struct wmi_device *wdev)
> > > > {
> > > > struct dell_wmi_priv *priv;
> > > > + int ret;
> > > >
> > > > if (!wmi_has_guid(DELL_WMI_DESCRIPTOR_GUID))
> > > > return -ENODEV;
> > >
> > > Just one suggestion, is above check still needed in dell-wmi.c code?
> > > I think that now it should be job of dell_wmi_get_descriptor_valid()
> > > function to fully validate if dell wmi descriptor driver is able to
> > > provide all needed information for dell-wmi driver.
> > >
> >
> > Yes, I believe it's still needed because if the GUID isn't on the bus the probe
> > routine for dell-wmi-descriptor won't run and dell_wmi_get_descriptor_valid()
> > will continually return -EPROBE_DEFER.
> >
> > That's the exact problem this patch exists for (preventing infinite deferred
> > probing).
> >
> > Perhaps a "cleaner" solution is to have the init routine of dell-wmi-descriptor
> > do this wmi_has_guid check and set the descriptor_valid variable to -ENODEV
> > so that "dependent" drivers don't need to.
>
> I understand. But I mean, if function dell_wmi_get_descriptor_valid()
> should not do that check for DELL_WMI_DESCRIPTOR_GUID itself.
>
> Because every driver which would use dell-wmi-descriptor needs to
> do that check.
I'll move the check to dell_wmi_descriptor_valid(). That actually does remove
the need for even including the GUID #define in a header file. All use will be
contained now directly in dell-wmi-descriptor.c.
>
> > > > + ret = dell_wmi_get_descriptor_valid();
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +
> > > > priv = devm_kzalloc(
> > > > &wdev->dev, sizeof(struct dell_wmi_priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > if (!priv)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Pali Rohár
> > > pali.rohar@...il.com
>
> --
> Pali Rohár
> pali.rohar@...il.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists