lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 11:42:58 -0800 From: Patrick McLean <chutzpah@...too.org> To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>, "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info> Subject: Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking regression in 4.14-rc and 4.13.11 On 2017-11-09 11:38 AM, Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 11:34:19AM -0800, Patrick McLean wrote: > >>> In particular, there are *no* nfsd changes in that 4.13.8..4.13.11 >>> range. There is a bunch of xfs changes, though. What's the underlying >>> filesystem that you are exporting? >> >> It's an ext4 filesystem. > > Had there been toolchain changes around the same period? > No changes, both the working and broken kernels were built with distro-provided gcc 5.4.0 and binutils 2.28.1.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists