linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.16 000/294] 3.16.50-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Nov 2017 13:12:51 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 000/294] 3.16.50-rc1 review

On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 04:59:58PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 08:03 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 12:40:36PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 13:21 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 12:55:30PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > > > > > I think if you upload the branch to the stable-rc git, that should produce
> > > > > > the automated build and boot results via email or via the
> > > > > > https://kernelci.org/job/ interface. Once there are some results
> > > > > > there, I'll go through the list once more to see what warnings
> > > > > > and failures remain.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I don't know of a way to have others push to that tree/branch at the
> > > > > moment :(
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'll go update that branch now...
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > 
> > > > With the arm-soc tree, we simply have a shared group-id on
> > > > gitolite.kernel.org and everyone in that group can push to it.
> > > > 
> > > > If that is the only thing you need, it should be trivial to let Ben
> > > > and Sasha push to /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/*.git as well,
> > > > I'm sure helpdesk@...nel.org can arrange that. Of course if you are
> > > > worried about having multiple accounts with write access to all the
> > > > branches, then that wouldn't be enough.
> > > 
> > > I think I'd rather send a pull request to Greg at the start of the
> > > review period.
> > > 
> > 
> > If you change the trees I am supposed to pull from for my builders,
> > please let me know.
> 
> If you're happy to keep supporting quilt-in-git then there's no change.
> I check your builders page and try to fix up build failures before even
> making a release candidate.
> 

Ah yes, kernelci won't pick that up. No problem to keep kerneltests going
as long as it adds value.

Guenter