[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711100144410.2690@nanos>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 01:46:52 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore: use ktime_get_real_fast_ns() instead of
__getnstimeofday()
On Fri, 10 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > Hmm, no. None of the regular accessor functions can be called from NMI
> > context safely.
>
> Right, that's what I mean: it must not get called from NMI context, but it
> currently is, at least for this case:
>
> NMI handler:
> something bad
> panic()
> kmsg_dump()
> pstore_dump()
> pstore_record_init()
> __getnstimeofday()
>
> I should probably add that to the changelog text ;-)
Indeed.
> Also, I have a related patch series that renames getrawmonotonic64(),
> current_kernel_time64() and get_monotonic_coarse64() to
> ktime_get_raw_ts64(), ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64() and
> ktime_get_coarse_ts64(), for consistency, but then I couldn't
> come up with a good name for __getnstimeofday64(), as the
> __ktime_get_*() naming is already used for a number of other
> things and I did not want to overload that more. Completely
> removing __getnstimeofday64() would be handier here.
Oh yes, it's an abomination.
> > The normal timekeeping accessor functions cannot be called between
> > timekeeping_suspend() and timekeeping_resume() at all. They will emit a
> > warning and can indeed crash and burn in one of the ways you described
> > above. This does not happen on x86 because the TSC will just work on
> > systems with pstore.
>
> Sure, except for __getnstimeofday64(), which will intentionally not warn but
> could crash in the clocksource driver (on non-x86). We do ignore the result
> from __getnstimeofday64() when timekeeping is suspended, but only after
> we call into the clocksource driver.
Right, let's get rid of it before it grows another user.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists