lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 10 Nov 2017 09:25:18 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bough Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
        Alex Lemberg <alex.lemberg@...disk.com>,
        Mateusz Nowak <mateusz.nowak@...el.com>,
        Yuliy Izrailov <Yuliy.Izrailov@...disk.com>,
        Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
        Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>,
        Das Asutosh <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...il.com>,
        Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>,
        Harjani Ritesh <riteshh@...eaurora.org>,
        Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@...dia.com>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V13 08/10] mmc: block: blk-mq: Separate card polling from recovery

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
> On 09/11/17 14:52, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
>>> On 08/11/17 11:30, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Recovery is simpler to understand if it is only used for errors. Create a
>>>>> separate function for card polling.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
>>>>
>>>> This looks good but I can't see why it's not folded into
>>>> patch 3 already. This error handling is introduced there.
>>>
>>> What are you on about?
>>
>> You are attacking your most valuable resource, a reviewer.
>>
>> And I even said the patch looks good.
>>
>> The only thing you attain with this kind of langauge is alienante
>> me and discourage others to review your patch set. You also
>> give your employer a bad name, since you are representing
>> them.
>
> 6 months of being messed around will do that.

Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth.

Nobody is after you, this is just hard stuff and too few people care to
help out with review etc. With this and with the block layer as well.
That makes things slow. It's noone's agenda to slow things down.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ