[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171110091703.7izzr7p3jkyxh7vd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:17:03 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86/boot/compressed/64: Introduce place_trampoline()
* Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> If bootloader enables 64-bit mode with 4-level paging, we need to
> switch over to 5-level paging. The switching requires disabling paging.
> It works fine if kernel itself is loaded below 4G.
>
> If bootloader put the kernel above 4G (not sure if anybody does this),
> we would loose control as soon as paging is disabled as code becomes
> unreachable.
>
> To handle the situation, we need a trampoline in lower memory that would
> take care about switching on 5-level paging.
>
> Apart from trampoline itself we also need place to store top level page
> table in lower memory as we don't have a way to load 64-bit value into
> CR3 from 32-bit mode. We only really need 8-bytes there as we only use
> the very first entry of the page table. But we allocate whole page
> anyway. We cannot have the code in the same because, there's hazard that
> a CPU would read page table speculatively and get confused seeing
> garbage.
>
> This patch introduces place_trampoline() that finds right spot in lower
> memory for trampoline, copies trampoline code there and setups new top
> level page table for 5-level paging.
>
> At this point we do all the preparation, but not yet use trampoline.
> It will be done in following patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S | 13 +++++++++++
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/pagetable.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/pagetable.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/boot/compressed/pagetable.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S
> index 6ac8239af2b6..4d1555b39de0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S
> @@ -315,6 +315,18 @@ ENTRY(startup_64)
> * The first step is go into compatibility mode.
> */
>
> + /*
> + * Find suitable place for trampoline and populate it.
> + * The address will be stored in RCX.
> + *
> + * RSI holds real mode data and need to be preserved across
> + * a function call.
> + */
> + pushq %rsi
> + call place_trampoline
> + popq %rsi
> + movq %rax, %rcx
> +
> /* Clear additional page table */
> leaq lvl5_pgtable(%rbx), %rdi
> xorq %rax, %rax
One request: it's always going to be fragile if the _only_ thing that uses the
trampoline is the 5-level paging code.
Could we use the trampoline in the 4-level paging case too? It's not required, but
would test much of the trampoline allocation and copying machinery - and the
performance cost is negligible.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists