linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] make function arg and structures as const

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:29:09 -0500
From:   "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:     Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>
Cc:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
        Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>, julia.lawall@...6.fr,
        trond.myklebust@...marydata.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] make function arg and structures as const

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:09:46AM -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/09/2017 09:21 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:40:27PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 18:14 +0200, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
> >>> Make the function argument as const. After thing change, make
> >>> the cache_detail structures as const.
> >>>
> >>> Bhumika Goyal (4):
> >>>   sunrpc: make the function arg as const
> >>>   NFS: make cache_detail structures const
> >>>   NFSD: make cache_detail structures const
> >>>   SUNRPC: make cache_detail structures const
> >>>
> >>>  fs/nfs/dns_resolve.c              | 2 +-
> >>>  fs/nfsd/export.c                  | 4 ++--
> >>>  fs/nfsd/nfs4idmap.c               | 4 ++--
> >>>  include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h      | 2 +-
> >>>  net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c | 4 ++--
> >>>  net/sunrpc/cache.c                | 2 +-
> >>>  net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c         | 4 ++--
> >>>  7 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>
> >> Looks pretty straightforward. You can add this to the set:
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
> > 
> > Thanks, I've applied 1, 3, and 4 and could take #2 as well if it's OK
> > with Trond/Anna.
> 
> I don't mind taking #2, it's already in my branch :)

OK, thanks.--b.