linux-kernel - Re: N900 kernel support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171110171639.GB31871@amd>
Date:   Fri, 10 Nov 2017 18:16:39 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc:     sre@...nel.org, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com, sakari.ailus@....fi,
        patrikbachan@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: N900 kernel support

Hi!

> Hi! Yesterday I updated https://elinux.org/N900 page based on data which
> I found in linux git repository. So driver status should be up-to-date.
> 
> I would like to ask, what is current status of the bluetooth driver? It
> is working on N900, or it has a problems?

See other email.

> Also are the any plans for bringing front webcam to work? IIRC there was
> problem that it was not possible to describe in DT that back and front
> cameras.

Front webcam... Few lines of code (or maybe only few lines of dts) and
perhaps quite a lot of debugging would be required there. OTOH... its
quality is not great, so...

BTW main camera only works in 1.3MPix mode. Getting 5MPix there would
be nice... 

> And what happened with ramp mode for camera autofocus?

We don't have userland application using those, so it was easier not
to merge them. It is few lines of code if you have application needing
these.

Best regards,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)