[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171110193954.GK8522@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:39:54 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Piotr Luc <piotr.luc@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
He Chen <he.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] x86/topology: Avoid wasting 128k for package id
array
> Andi's idea would work and the code would become much cleaner, if
> smp_store_cpu_info() only overwrote cpu_data for new physically hotplugged cpus.
Can always just use a separate per_cpu variable for this that is not cleared.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists