[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzbroWqi+FTdYhRVSwUZ-M0wDVxjXqDbh40JEnXc2LdgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:36:57 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>,
Maged Michael <maged.michael@...il.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
David Sehr <sehr@...gle.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] x86: Fix missing core serialization on migration
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
> x86 can return to user-space through sysexit and sysretq, which are not
> core serializing. This breaks expectations from user-space about
> sequential consistency from a single-threaded self-modifying program
> point of view in specific migration patterns.
>
> Feedback is welcome,
We should check with Intel. I would actually be surprised if the I$
can be out of sync with the D$ after a sysretq. It would actually
break things like "read code from disk" too in theory.
Hpa? Can you check?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists