[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <093f19ac-9fac-8ee8-7671-7b4d1807a9b8@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 17:56:14 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Megha Dey <megha.dey@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, kstewart@...uxfoundation.org,
yu-cheng.yu@...el.com, len.brown@...el.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, peterz@...radead.org, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com,
pombredanne@...b.com, me@...ehuey.com, bp@...e.de,
grzegorz.andrejczuk@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com, corbet@....net,
ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, megha.dey@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 3/3] x86, bm: Add documentation on Intel Branch
Monitoring
On 11/11/17 13:20, Megha Dey wrote:
> This patch adds the Documentation/x86/intel_bm.txt file with some
> information about Intel Branch monitoring.
> +4. Window count select: /sys/devices/intel-bm/window_cnt_sel
> + Possible values are:
> + ‘00 = instructions retired
> + ‘01 = branches retired
> + ‘10 = returned instructions retired
> + ‘11 = indirect branch instructions retired
> + By default, it has a value of 0.
Hi,
Is the 'xx binary notation? If so, it would be nice to say so..
or whatever it is.
thanks,
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists