[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171113165831.19ebc9fa@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 16:58:31 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
ave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>,
Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>,
Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the drm
tree
Hi all,
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 20:37:56 +0000 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 44cd3939c111b7 ("drm/tilcdc: Remove redundant OF_DETACHED flag setting")
>
> from the drm tree and commit:
>
> f948d6d8b792bb ("of: overlay: avoid race condition between applying multiple overlays")
>
> from the devicetree tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c
> index 482299a6f3b0,54025af534d4..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c
> @@@ -163,12 -162,8 +162,6 @@@ static struct device_node * __init tilc
> return NULL;
> }
>
> - ret = of_resolve_phandles(overlay);
> - if (ret) {
> - pr_err("%s: Failed to resolve phandles: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> - return NULL;
> - }
> - of_node_set_flag(overlay, OF_DETACHED);
> --
> return overlay;
> }
>
Just a reminder that this conflict still exists.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists