linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v3 1/6] x86/paravirt: Add pv_idle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANRm+CwWu-h96wxePS6kHMFquQR1_jxt1hyHcgu-Cs0rcNCBZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Nov 2017 19:09:09 +0800
From:   Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To:     Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc:     Quan Xu <quan.xu03@...il.com>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure)" 
        <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
        Quan Xu <quan.xu0@...il.com>,
        Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@...il.com>,
        Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
        Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 1/6] x86/paravirt: Add pv_idle_ops to paravirt ops

2017-11-13 18:53 GMT+08:00 Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>:
> On 13/11/17 11:06, Quan Xu wrote:
>> From: Quan Xu <quan.xu0@...il.com>
>>
>> So far, pv_idle_ops.poll is the only ops for pv_idle. .poll is called
>> in idle path which will poll for a while before we enter the real idle
>> state.
>>
>> In virtualization, idle path includes several heavy operations
>> includes timer access(LAPIC timer or TSC deadline timer) which will
>> hurt performance especially for latency intensive workload like message
>> passing task. The cost is mainly from the vmexit which is a hardware
>> context switch between virtual machine and hypervisor. Our solution is
>> to poll for a while and do not enter real idle path if we can get the
>> schedule event during polling.
>>
>> Poll may cause the CPU waste so we adopt a smart polling mechanism to
>> reduce the useless poll.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Quan Xu <quan.xu0@...il.com>
>> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
>> Cc: Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>
>> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
>> Cc: x86@...nel.org
>> Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
>
> Hmm, is the idle entry path really so critical to performance that a new
> pvops function is necessary? Wouldn't a function pointer, maybe guarded
> by a static key, be enough? A further advantage would be that this would
> work on other architectures, too.

There is a "Adaptive halt-polling" which are merged to upstream more
than two years ago avoids to thread the critical path and has already
been ported to other architectures. https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/3/615

Regards,
Wanpeng Li